How
you can save on search expenses and improve your results at the same time
Most acquirers agree that the biggest hurdle in the acquisition strategy is finding
good deals. Huge expenses in resources, capital and time are spent to conduct hundreds of searches
which often yield unpredictable results. There are four basic limitation
that prevents corporations from being as effective in finding good deals as
their intermediary counter part.
Corporate
M&A teams are made up of experienced transaction handlers but are not search
specialist. Corporate
M&A executives possess strong financial, negotiation and operational
skills. However, they often lack the ability to consistently find many
good opportunities. Intermediaries train extensively in this area because
identifying the deal is the primary value that is offered to their
clients. Unless a deal is identified no other M&A activity can take
place. Traditionally, the search process has been the Achilles heel for
most companies and intermediaries can guarantee the success of all parties by
being competent in this area.
The
same cost and effort spent by an intermediary results in multiple transactions,
while acquirer companies are limited to deals that fit only their specific
acquisition requirements.
Having searched a thousand potential companies, five companies may be found that
represent good deal candidates. Usually, each company attributes will
meet a unique deal category which can easily be satisfied by the
intermediary. However, the acquirer company will only benefit if a match
is made but cannot take advantage of other transactions which represented good
opportunities for other
companies.
Intermediaries
are willing to invest funds to collect and maintain data on majority of private
companies which greatly extend the market place for their clients while a single
corporation is unable to justify the costs associated with collecting this
information. The
disparity of sources for collecting accurate data on private companies which
include newspaper, trade publication, other information provider and the
companies themselves lends itself to be a daunting task. However, in
the highly competitive field of M&A, it is often the accuracy and timeliness
of information on companies that gives one firm a competitive advantage over
another.
Relationships
with sellers are establish by intermediaries well in advance of those companies
being available for sale while acquiring companies become find out about
sellers only after they are announced which may be too late.
Intermediaries realize that being first at finding future clients begins by
establishing a relationship with those companies today. These
relationships are nurtured over time to create trust between the seller and the
intermediary who has been preparing the seller on reaching the financial goals
needed to sell their company. Too many conflicts of interest prevent
acquirers from establishing similar relationships with sellers or acting in the same
capacity.
Working
with Franklin Hamilton can dramatically increase the number of deal candidates
to review while reducing your
expenses on the portion of the acquisition strategy which is best outsourced to
an intermediary.